"What we did do is direct our caramel suppliers to make a manufacturing process modification in order to reduce the level of 4-MEI in our caramel so as to meet the requirement set by the state of California's Proposition 65." For its part, PepsiCo said its beverages "are and always will be safe for consumption." "Consumers will notice no difference in our products and have no reason at all for any health concerns. There is no scientific evidence that 4-MEI in foods and beverages is a threat to human health," it added. California voters passed Proposition 65 in 1986, and the law aims to protect state residents from "chemicals known to cause cancer, birth defects or other reproductive harm, and to inform citizens about exposures to such chemicals." A California court ruled in December 2011 that 4-MEI could be listed as a known carcinogen under Prop 65. The state set a 29-microgram benchmark for 4-MEI in products. Anything that may expose consumers to a daily level higher than that must carry a warning label.
Displaying 1 of 3
Page:Next >>
View article on one pageSource: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/IWLeadership/~3/KZeOjPtTpE0/ReadArticle.aspx
catherine tate theo epstein theo epstein darknet james ray williston nd williston nd
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.